Legislation Details

File #: 26-1380    Version: 1
Type: Resolution Status: Consent Agenda
File created: 3/30/2026 In control: City Council
On agenda: 5/6/2026 Final action:
Title: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following resolutions for the Oceanside Lighting District, Assessment District No. 2-1991 so as to initiate the proceedings for the renewal thereof by: 1) directing the City Engineer to prepare an Engineer's Report; 2) approving the Engineer's Report as prepared or modified; 3) declaring the intent to levy and collect assessments for FY 2026-27 and setting a public hearing for June 3, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers regarding the proposed assessments.
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Lighting District FY26-27
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

DATE:  May 6, 2026

 

TO:                       Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers

 

FROM: Public Works Department

TITLE: 
INITIATION OF THE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE RENEWAL OF THE OCEANSIDE LIGHTING DISTRICT, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2-1991, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING 

 

RECOMMENDATION

title

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the following resolutions for the Oceanside Lighting District, Assessment District No. 2-1991 so as to initiate the proceedings for the renewal thereof by: 1) directing the City Engineer to prepare an Engineer’s Report; 2) approving the Engineer’s Report as prepared or modified; 3) declaring the intent to levy and collect assessments for FY 2026-27 and setting a public hearing for June 3, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers regarding the proposed assessments.

body                     

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS

 

The Oceanside Lighting District, Assessment District No. 2-1991 (“District”), was formed in 1991 under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “1972 Act”). The 1972 Act requires the annual renewal of the District in order to levy and collect assessments for the ensuing fiscal year. The purpose of the District and the levy of the assessments is to provide funds for the operation and maintenance of streetlights and other improvements on public streets within the District.

At the time the District was formed, the intent was to levy both “general” and “local” assessments to each applicable property within the District. A “general” benefit assessment covers costs associated with the City’s share of the state freeway and highway lighting costs for said thoroughfares and are assessed against each parcel of land within the District. A “local” benefit assessment covers costs applicable to a property which fronts or adjoins a collector or local street.

ANALYSIS

The City Council, under the 1972 Act, must approve the assessments being charged by the District. Also, the levy and collection of assessments requires that an Engineer’s Report be prepared, which identifies the proposed improvements to be administered and maintained, and the method of apportionment (Exhibit A). The report also provides an estimate of the costs and the proposed assessments to be levied against the respective properties (Exhibit B). A diagram is also prepared showing the parcels to be assessed (Exhibit D). The assessment roll, showing the proposed amount to be levied against each parcel (Exhibit C), is available for review in the City Clerk’s Office.

The assessments are based on a formula containing costs associated with both general and local benefit zones as shown in Exhibit B of the Engineer’s Report. The general benefit zone is comprised of the streetlights located on the prime, major and secondary arterials. The general benefit zone costs, which include the City’s share of the state freeway and highway lighting costs for these streets, are assessed against each parcel of land within the District. The local benefit zone is comprised of property which fronts or adjoins a collector or local street. Property within this zone is assessed its proportionate share of the costs associated with the lighting system as well as its share of the general benefit zone costs. 

The benefit units assigned to each parcel of land are based upon the same benefit units that are used to calculate the City’s thoroughfare fees. The use of the property is the determining factor in the corresponding benefit unit assignment. For example, if a single-family residential parcel is assigned 10 benefit units and the average cost per lighting assessment unit (which includes the cost for the general benefit zone plus the local benefit zone) is $1.58, then that single-family residential parcel will be assessed $15.80.

A current estimate of the costs related to the District, the proposed assessments for FY 2026-27 are contained in the accompanying Engineer’s Report. The expenses decreased for FY 2026-27 due to the expiration of the Lighting Retrofit Lease Agreement in January 2026. For the public hearing scheduled for June 3, 2026, the City Council will be requested to approve the Engineer’s Report. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Engineer’s Report as submitted or modified, if applicable, and direct that the Engineer’s Report be placed on file with the City Clerk’s Office for public review

 

FISCAL IMPACT

 

The estimated annual Lighting District assessments of $1,650,480 will be appropriated to account 320317221.4142. Expenses to cover the cost to operate and maintain the street light system are estimated to be $1,181,659. The FY 2026-27 Revenue and Expenses for the District are shown in the table below with a detailed breakdown shown in Exhibit A.

Revenue

Amount

Account

Annual Assessments

$1,650,480

320317221.4142

Total Revenue

$1,650,480

 

Expenses

 

 

Personnel

$     90,864

320317221.5105

Electricity

     954,738

320317221.5315

Professional Services

       11,343

320317221.5305

Advertising

            400

320317221.5360

Internal Service

       14,314

320317221.5600

Street Light Maintenance

     110,000

320317221.6900.0101

Total Expenses

$1,181,659

 

 

 

COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE REPORT

 

Does not apply.

 

CITY ATTORNEY’S ANALYSIS

 

The referenced documents have been reviewed by the City Attorney and approved as to form.

 

end

Prepared by: Vicki L. Gutierrez, Real Estate Manager

Reviewed by: Hamid Bahadori, Public Works Director                                                                                                         

Submitted by: Jonathan Borrego, City Manager                                                                                                                               

 

ATTACHMENTS:

1.                      Resolutions and Engineers Report (including Exhibits A, B & D)

2.                      Exhibit C is on file with the City Clerk